|
not sure why we have to leave a review of a book order but well I ordered this book for a friend and it came when it was suppose to and it is in good shape. Hope this helps who ever needs a review of this book.
As a nurse, it's not easy to use all of the competencies our education has provided. This is a difficult little book to find. It is an essential to those who seek to understand the place that nurses have in our health or "disease" care community. And yet people go without health care. I'm so glad I found it here.
This pamphlet gives an excellent overview of the oppression of women healers and women in general at the hands of the church and the medical establishment. A must read for anyone interested in medical history, feminism and anti-oppression work.
I purchased this book looking for an historical perspective of women healers. Although this book does provide a history it is extremely biased towards the feminist idealogy. The book was written in the 70's and it shows with it's bias and underlying anger. The good thing about reading this is to realise how far women and the health system have come in the equality debate.
1-26). Ehrenreich and English's book has been highly influential in some feminist and New Age circles since its publication in the early 70s. Unfortunately, Ehrenreich and English's research was selective, incomplete and ultimately false. David Harley systematically examined the evidence in his article "Historians as Demonologists: The Myth of the Midwife-Witch" (Social History of Medicine 3 (1990), pp. In *The Witch in History*, feminist historian Diane Purkiss writes "midwives were more likely to be found helping witch-hunters" than as victims of their inquiries.As a result, this book's value lies mainly in its indication of how some early feminist views of history were marked more by ideology and enthusiasm than rigor, comprehensive analysis of the data and objective methodology. Their study was subjected to critical analysis in later decades and found to be deeply flawed.
Many accusations of witchcraft centred on still-births and infant deaths, with the blame for these occurrences being put on the malicious magic of witches. Its thesis - that the women persecuted as "witches" in the Witch Craze tended to be midwives and healers - fits neatly with some ideological views of the suppression of women and has since been seen as historical confirmation of a patriarchal desire to control science and medicine and maintain control over birth, healing and women's bodies.As a result, their thesis has become orthodoxy in these circles and has recently been given a popular boost via Dan Brown's pseudo historical thriller, *The Da Vinci Code*. and found that being a midwife actually *decreased* the chances of being charged with witchcraft. Ehrenrich and English had taken a few isolated cases, assumed they were the norm and then extrapolated from them to conclude that healers and midwives were a particular target of the Witch Crazes. In fact, the evidence indicates otherwise. Far from being more likely to be accused of witchcraft, midwives and village healers were more likely to be the accusers, or to be witnesses summoned to support such accusations.
It's value as a work of history is minimal.
|
